LGTM, thanks for contributing, @EmilTholin look good to you?

Sorry for the slow reply, I just got back from vacation.

I think it looks good! I think an await anywhere in the test will make it so the following statements are run in the next Svelte tick, but it could be nice to have act to make this library feel more familiar to react-testing-library users.

@EmilTholin if that's the case then I'm actually thinking it would stay as is. I'd rather keep this in the spirit of svelte. Can you confirm an await will work? If so maybe we busy update the docs accordingly?

This was discussed in this issue a while back and @pngwn was kind enough to outline and explain why await anywhere might be enough.

The ability to return any promise from act might warrant adding it to this library as well though, but I'm not sure.

await anywhere might be enough.

I'd rather use public API from svelte. Looking at

Returns a promise that resolves once any pending state changes have been applied, or in the next microtask if there are none.

it sounds like await is only enough when there are no pending state updates. Once there are some you are out of luck. Let's not be too clever about this. Especially async stuff.

@allcontributors please add @eps1lon for code

@benmonro

I've put up a pull request to add @eps1lon! 🎉

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.8.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀